Spaces in environmental design can suggest "rest" or "motion". It is the ratio of the length to width that determines the perception. A place (where a person is at rest - and has a conceived center) cannot be more than twice as long as it is wide.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956ac/956ac446af36be65c90bcea6daa52b1710febdfc" alt=""
Paths are, by their proportion, spaces that suggest movement. Their length to width ratio is over two to one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7d82/b7d82b9886f6fd7602b870108124028be01a6414" alt=""
Can a space be both a Path and a Place? - NO !!. If it is ambiguous, that is a design fault. Clarity is the goal. There can and almost always is a combination of paths and places.
Architects throughout the centuries have used clever combinations and variations of path and place. Here are a few samples -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89bc1/89bc11442755a1baaa992f6b0a4698d2eb47e958" alt=""
QUESTIONS TO ASK YOURSELF -
- Are the "paths" clearly indicated?
- What role does light play in each of the diagrams?
- What would different heights of these spaces mean to the determination
and experience of path and place?
- How could you make the experience more "distinctive" and "memorable"?
. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment